<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 166 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the addition under section 40A(3) of the IT Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of genuine transactions and the AO&#039;s discretion in assessing each case based on relevant factors, leading to the deletion of the disallowance in this instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:33:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 166 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the addition under section 40A(3) of the IT Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of genuine transactions and the AO&#039;s discretion in assessing each case based on relevant factors, leading to the deletion of the disallowance in this instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>