<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 279 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65243</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Key rulings included the allowance of loss carry forward due to justified late filing, deletion of certain disallowances, and adjustments to depreciation claims. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify specific deductions and upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on several contested issues, including unexplained cash credits and staff welfare expenses. Additionally, the Tribunal provided partial relief on entertainment and conference expenses, while maintaining certain disallowances as per prior decisions. Overall, the Tribunal&#039;s decisions favored the assessee on multiple issues, resulting in a partial victory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:41:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 279 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65243</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Key rulings included the allowance of loss carry forward due to justified late filing, deletion of certain disallowances, and adjustments to depreciation claims. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify specific deductions and upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on several contested issues, including unexplained cash credits and staff welfare expenses. Additionally, the Tribunal provided partial relief on entertainment and conference expenses, while maintaining certain disallowances as per prior decisions. Overall, the Tribunal&#039;s decisions favored the assessee on multiple issues, resulting in a partial victory.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>