<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 287 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the assessee&#039;s application, recalling the previous order and restoring the appeal for a fresh hearing. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s claims regarding non-receipt of the hearing notice credible and emphasized the importance of fair opportunity and compliance with legal procedures in judicial proceedings. The service by affixation was deemed invalid due to discrepancies in the process followed, further supporting the assessee&#039;s arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 287 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the assessee&#039;s application, recalling the previous order and restoring the appeal for a fresh hearing. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s claims regarding non-receipt of the hearing notice credible and emphasized the importance of fair opportunity and compliance with legal procedures in judicial proceedings. The service by affixation was deemed invalid due to discrepancies in the process followed, further supporting the assessee&#039;s arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>