<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 282 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65239</link>
    <description>For tax purposes, book treatment does not determine allowability: advertisement spend on launching a new product was held revenue in nature and deductible despite being shown as deferred revenue expenditure. A warranty provision based on scientific estimation and actual experience was treated as an accrued liability, not a contingent one, and allowed. Royalty payable outside India was deductible where tax had been deducted and deposited as required by Chapter XVII-B. Tax paid by an employer on a managing director&#039;s salary was not allowable, while house rent and club fee perquisites were not disallowed on the material available. Payments to a foreign collaborator were not hit by section 40A(2)(b) absent proof of excessiveness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 282 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65239</link>
      <description>For tax purposes, book treatment does not determine allowability: advertisement spend on launching a new product was held revenue in nature and deductible despite being shown as deferred revenue expenditure. A warranty provision based on scientific estimation and actual experience was treated as an accrued liability, not a contingent one, and allowed. Royalty payable outside India was deductible where tax had been deducted and deposited as required by Chapter XVII-B. Tax paid by an employer on a managing director&#039;s salary was not allowable, while house rent and club fee perquisites were not disallowed on the material available. Payments to a foreign collaborator were not hit by section 40A(2)(b) absent proof of excessiveness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>