<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 276 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, permitting the deduction of Rs. 12,00,000 for computing book profits under Section 115JB. The decision emphasized the legislative intent to levy minimum tax on certain companies&#039; book profits to prevent tax avoidance by zero-tax entities. The Tribunal found the provision to be a contingent liability, not an ascertained liability, as no salary was payable due to the company&#039;s losses. This ruling aligned with the law&#039;s purpose, preventing undue hardship and injustice, and rejected the hyper-technical interpretation of the Assessing Officer, diverging from the spirit of the legislation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 13:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 276 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, permitting the deduction of Rs. 12,00,000 for computing book profits under Section 115JB. The decision emphasized the legislative intent to levy minimum tax on certain companies&#039; book profits to prevent tax avoidance by zero-tax entities. The Tribunal found the provision to be a contingent liability, not an ascertained liability, as no salary was payable due to the company&#039;s losses. This ruling aligned with the law&#039;s purpose, preventing undue hardship and injustice, and rejected the hyper-technical interpretation of the Assessing Officer, diverging from the spirit of the legislation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>