<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 125 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65218</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the investment allowance and deletion of customs duty addition. However, the issue of depreciation rate for down hole equipment was remanded for further examination. The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:34:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 125 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65218</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the investment allowance and deletion of customs duty addition. However, the issue of depreciation rate for down hole equipment was remanded for further examination. The appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>