<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 158 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65202</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by rejecting the taxability of the cash incentive, deleting the disallowance under section 40A(3), and remanding the investment allowance claim on the computer for further assessment by the Assessing Officer based on the installation location and its role in manufacturing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 158 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65202</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal by rejecting the taxability of the cash incentive, deleting the disallowance under section 40A(3), and remanding the investment allowance claim on the computer for further assessment by the Assessing Officer based on the installation location and its role in manufacturing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>