<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 140 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied exemption under s. 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act for a house property as the assessee did not fully pay for the property and lacked immediate transfer of ownership. However, exemption under s. 5(1)(xxvi) was allowed for Rs. 35,000 deposited in the bank account from the sale proceeds of a house in Calcutta, reducing the bank balance in the assessee&#039;s net wealth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 140 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied exemption under s. 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth Tax Act for a house property as the assessee did not fully pay for the property and lacked immediate transfer of ownership. However, exemption under s. 5(1)(xxvi) was allowed for Rs. 35,000 deposited in the bank account from the sale proceeds of a house in Calcutta, reducing the bank balance in the assessee&#039;s net wealth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>