<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 200 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that the ITO&#039;s rectification under section 154 was a mere change of opinion and not a rectifiable mistake. Additionally, the expenditure on purchasing tickets for a foreign tour was deemed allowable for the relevant accounting period, as the ITO had already allowed it during the assessment proceedings. Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the ITO&#039;s order under section 154 in both instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 200 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues. It held that the ITO&#039;s rectification under section 154 was a mere change of opinion and not a rectifiable mistake. Additionally, the expenditure on purchasing tickets for a foreign tour was deemed allowable for the relevant accounting period, as the ITO had already allowed it during the assessment proceedings. Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the ITO&#039;s order under section 154 in both instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>