<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 74 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65171</link>
    <description>The appeals by the assessees were allowed as the Commissioner failed to provide conclusive findings on the issues raised, and the reasons for the assessment orders being erroneous differed from those in the notices. The assessees were not given an opportunity to address new points raised in the orders. Consequently, the orders passed by the CWT, Agra, under Section 25(2) were cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:29:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 74 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65171</link>
      <description>The appeals by the assessees were allowed as the Commissioner failed to provide conclusive findings on the issues raised, and the reasons for the assessment orders being erroneous differed from those in the notices. The assessees were not given an opportunity to address new points raised in the orders. Consequently, the orders passed by the CWT, Agra, under Section 25(2) were cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>