<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 132 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65145</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI-E allowed the appeals by partners of Rama Talkies, holding that the assessments made by the ITO, E-Ward, Ghaziabad for the assessment year 1970-71 were null and void due to lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal emphasized that jurisdiction is fundamental to the validity of proceedings and rejected the departmental representative&#039;s argument that the challenge to jurisdiction could not be raised before the Appellate Authority. The Tribunal upheld the preliminary objection, declaring the orders passed by the ITO, E-Ward, Ghaziabad as null and void, and allowed the appeals in part based on the jurisdictional challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:10:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 132 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65145</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT DELHI-E allowed the appeals by partners of Rama Talkies, holding that the assessments made by the ITO, E-Ward, Ghaziabad for the assessment year 1970-71 were null and void due to lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal emphasized that jurisdiction is fundamental to the validity of proceedings and rejected the departmental representative&#039;s argument that the challenge to jurisdiction could not be raised before the Appellate Authority. The Tribunal upheld the preliminary objection, declaring the orders passed by the ITO, E-Ward, Ghaziabad as null and void, and allowed the appeals in part based on the jurisdictional challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>