<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 126 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65142</link>
    <description>CBDT circulars granting relief where assessed income fell below the specified monetary limit were treated as binding on the Income-tax Officer and enforceable in favour of the taxpayer. Because the assessed income was Rs. 8,640, the statutory penalty under section 271(1)(c) was considered unwarranted on the facts, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:07:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 126 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65142</link>
      <description>CBDT circulars granting relief where assessed income fell below the specified monetary limit were treated as binding on the Income-tax Officer and enforceable in favour of the taxpayer. Because the assessed income was Rs. 8,640, the statutory penalty under section 271(1)(c) was considered unwarranted on the facts, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>