<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 144 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65137</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; decisions and allowed the appeal by the assessee, concluding that the value of the jewellery could not be assessed in the assessee&#039;s hands for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence establishing ownership of the jewellery by the assessee, particularly noting that the bank locker was in the son&#039;s name and considering the statement of the elderly lady claiming ownership.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 144 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65137</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the lower authorities&#039; decisions and allowed the appeal by the assessee, concluding that the value of the jewellery could not be assessed in the assessee&#039;s hands for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence establishing ownership of the jewellery by the assessee, particularly noting that the bank locker was in the son&#039;s name and considering the statement of the elderly lady claiming ownership.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>