<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 222 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that unabsorbed carry forward depreciation must be deducted when computing business profits for section 80HHC deductions. The Assessing Officer was deemed justified in rectifying the order under section 154 as the issue was not addressed by the CIT(A) and was not considered debatable due to the provisions of section 32(2). The appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:42:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 222 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that unabsorbed carry forward depreciation must be deducted when computing business profits for section 80HHC deductions. The Assessing Officer was deemed justified in rectifying the order under section 154 as the issue was not addressed by the CIT(A) and was not considered debatable due to the provisions of section 32(2). The appeal by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>