<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 98 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance of advertisement and publicity expenses by the Income Tax Officer to Rs. 420. The expenses were found to be related to the business of the assessee and not shown to be an allowable expenditure under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the Revenue failed to justify interference with the AAC&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 14:22:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 98 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision to restrict the disallowance of advertisement and publicity expenses by the Income Tax Officer to Rs. 420. The expenses were found to be related to the business of the assessee and not shown to be an allowable expenditure under the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating that the Revenue failed to justify interference with the AAC&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>