<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (6) TMI 63 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65102</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the ITO for a fresh assessment. The ITAT disagreed with the Commissioner&#039;s decision to ignore the revised return filed by the assessee after the assessment was completed, directing the ITO to consider the revised return. The ITAT also directed the ITO to address the claim to weighted deduction and allowed the expenditure on salary and commission, along with interest on credit balances of the Karta and his wife.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:22:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (6) TMI 63 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65102</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the ITO for a fresh assessment. The ITAT disagreed with the Commissioner&#039;s decision to ignore the revised return filed by the assessee after the assessment was completed, directing the ITO to consider the revised return. The ITAT also directed the ITO to address the claim to weighted deduction and allowed the expenditure on salary and commission, along with interest on credit balances of the Karta and his wife.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>