<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 64 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the assessment due to improper service of notice under Section 148, finding the proceedings under Section 147 were not validly initiated. The Tribunal did not address the jurisdiction issue regarding the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) or the validity of the addition of Rs. 5,68,400 based on Sales Tax authorities&#039; order, as the assessment was invalidated on procedural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 64 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the assessment due to improper service of notice under Section 148, finding the proceedings under Section 147 were not validly initiated. The Tribunal did not address the jurisdiction issue regarding the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) or the validity of the addition of Rs. 5,68,400 based on Sales Tax authorities&#039; order, as the assessment was invalidated on procedural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>