<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 63 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65096</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing a fresh decision. The CIT(A) was instructed to reexamine each supplier&#039;s case, consider the material filed by the assessee, and adhere to principles of natural justice by allowing the assessee to rebut evidence collected by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 13:04:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 63 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65096</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing a fresh decision. The CIT(A) was instructed to reexamine each supplier&#039;s case, consider the material filed by the assessee, and adhere to principles of natural justice by allowing the assessee to rebut evidence collected by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>