<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 304 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the assessment order under section 158BC for the block period, concluding it was barred by limitation per section 158BE. The only valid panchnama was dated 6-11-1996, rendering the 14-9-1998 panchnama invalid. Consequently, the assessment completed on 30-9-1998 was outside the permissible timeframe. Other grounds were deemed academic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 304 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the assessment order under section 158BC for the block period, concluding it was barred by limitation per section 158BE. The only valid panchnama was dated 6-11-1996, rendering the 14-9-1998 panchnama invalid. Consequently, the assessment completed on 30-9-1998 was outside the permissible timeframe. Other grounds were deemed academic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>