<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 246 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the compensation received by the assessee was not a capital receipt and did not constitute a transfer of any capital asset. However, the compensation was deemed taxable as casual and non-recurring income under section 10(3) of the Income-tax Act. The appeals filed by the assessees were dismissed, and the orders of the lower authorities were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103514" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 246 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the compensation received by the assessee was not a capital receipt and did not constitute a transfer of any capital asset. However, the compensation was deemed taxable as casual and non-recurring income under section 10(3) of the Income-tax Act. The appeals filed by the assessees were dismissed, and the orders of the lower authorities were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>