<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65064</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the revenue&#039;s position, declaring the firm a resident of India due to its formation and operational activities being rooted in India, despite contract execution in Kuwait. Control and management were deemed to be in India, justifying taxation of income from Kuwait operations. The assessee&#039;s claim of non-resident status was rejected. Additional minor issues were also addressed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65064</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the revenue&#039;s position, declaring the firm a resident of India due to its formation and operational activities being rooted in India, despite contract execution in Kuwait. Control and management were deemed to be in India, justifying taxation of income from Kuwait operations. The assessee&#039;s claim of non-resident status was rejected. Additional minor issues were also addressed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>