<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the interest paid on borrowings cannot be offset against the interest earned from Fixed Deposit Receipts for income tax purposes. The decision was based on the lack of correlation between the purpose of the expenditure and the income earned, as required by Section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 19:01:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the interest paid on borrowings cannot be offset against the interest earned from Fixed Deposit Receipts for income tax purposes. The decision was based on the lack of correlation between the purpose of the expenditure and the income earned, as required by Section 57(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>