<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 117 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65034</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 47,500 to the total income under &#039;Income from other sources&#039; was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence beyond mere valuation reports to support income additions, citing legal precedents and highlighting the burden of proof on the revenue for understated considerations. Referring to the unconventional nature of the property and valuation discrepancies, the Tribunal concluded that the department failed to establish discrepancies beyond valuation reports to support the addition, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:54:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 117 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65034</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the addition of Rs. 47,500 to the total income under &#039;Income from other sources&#039; was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized the need for evidence beyond mere valuation reports to support income additions, citing legal precedents and highlighting the burden of proof on the revenue for understated considerations. Referring to the unconventional nature of the property and valuation discrepancies, the Tribunal concluded that the department failed to establish discrepancies beyond valuation reports to support the addition, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>