<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (12) TMI 100 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding no deliberate concealment as the disclosed income was accepted without omission following a survey. Explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c) was deemed inapplicable to survey cases under section 133A. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the requirement for positive proof of concealment, leading to the penalty cancellation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (12) TMI 100 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding no deliberate concealment as the disclosed income was accepted without omission following a survey. Explanation 5 to section 271(1)(c) was deemed inapplicable to survey cases under section 133A. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the requirement for positive proof of concealment, leading to the penalty cancellation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>