<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 195 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65021</link>
    <description>A unilateral relinquishment of life interest was not a taxable gift because the statutory definition required a voluntary transfer between at least two persons without consideration. The deeming rule for release or surrender applied only where the Revenue established that the transaction was not bona fide, and no such finding was recorded. The surrender was treated as accelerating the beneficiaries&#039; interest rather than effecting a taxable transfer, so no gift-tax liability arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 195 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65021</link>
      <description>A unilateral relinquishment of life interest was not a taxable gift because the statutory definition required a voluntary transfer between at least two persons without consideration. The deeming rule for release or surrender applied only where the Revenue established that the transaction was not bona fide, and no such finding was recorded. The surrender was treated as accelerating the beneficiaries&#039; interest rather than effecting a taxable transfer, so no gift-tax liability arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>