<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the miscellaneous application could not be dismissed solely due to non-appearance, emphasizing the need to consider the merits of the case. The decision highlighted that the Tribunal must provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the case was referred back to the regular Bench for reconsideration in line with the majority opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the miscellaneous application could not be dismissed solely due to non-appearance, emphasizing the need to consider the merits of the case. The decision highlighted that the Tribunal must provide the assessee with a fair opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the case was referred back to the regular Bench for reconsideration in line with the majority opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>