<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 111 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64992</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order, ruling that &quot;loss&quot; under section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, does not include &quot;unabsorbed depreciation.&quot; The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the assessment order allowing the set-off of depreciation against profits was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. The Tribunal held that High Court decisions are binding on Tribunals, following the Andhra Pradesh High Court&#039;s interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 111 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64992</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s order, ruling that &quot;loss&quot; under section 115J of the Income-tax Act, 1961, does not include &quot;unabsorbed depreciation.&quot; The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the assessment order allowing the set-off of depreciation against profits was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue interests. The Tribunal held that High Court decisions are binding on Tribunals, following the Andhra Pradesh High Court&#039;s interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>