<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 160 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction for compensatory interest on late payment of Sales-tax under section 37(1) of the Act, citing it as compensatory and deductible. However, the penalty claimed was disallowed as it was considered penal in nature and required discretion for imposition. The appeal was partly allowed, permitting the deduction for interest but not for the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:58:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 160 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction for compensatory interest on late payment of Sales-tax under section 37(1) of the Act, citing it as compensatory and deductible. However, the penalty claimed was disallowed as it was considered penal in nature and required discretion for imposition. The appeal was partly allowed, permitting the deduction for interest but not for the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>