<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 159 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the revisionary order of the Commissioner of Income-tax, indicating a lack of jurisdiction and partially allowed the appeal. It granted a higher rate of depreciation for DLY/DLZ cars and coaches used for hire purposes based on statutory provisions and circulars, while remitting the issue of pick-up vans for further assessment by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 159 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the revisionary order of the Commissioner of Income-tax, indicating a lack of jurisdiction and partially allowed the appeal. It granted a higher rate of depreciation for DLY/DLZ cars and coaches used for hire purposes based on statutory provisions and circulars, while remitting the issue of pick-up vans for further assessment by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>