<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 65 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64968</link>
    <description>Penalty for failure to make a compulsory deposit under the Compulsory Deposit Scheme was held not leviable where the deposit was made after the due date but within the same financial year and the delay was supported by reasonable cause. The time limit was construed on an approach analogous to the advance tax timetable under section 211 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so a deposit made within the financial year was treated as within the statutory time frame. The amendment introducing the words &quot;without reasonable cause&quot; was read as allowing relief for genuine hardship, and bona fide wrong professional advice was accepted as reasonable cause. The penalty was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:55:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 65 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64968</link>
      <description>Penalty for failure to make a compulsory deposit under the Compulsory Deposit Scheme was held not leviable where the deposit was made after the due date but within the same financial year and the delay was supported by reasonable cause. The time limit was construed on an approach analogous to the advance tax timetable under section 211 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, so a deposit made within the financial year was treated as within the statutory time frame. The amendment introducing the words &quot;without reasonable cause&quot; was read as allowing relief for genuine hardship, and bona fide wrong professional advice was accepted as reasonable cause. The penalty was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>