<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64962</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the order passed under section 263 on legal grounds due to the Commissioner exceeding jurisdiction by revising an order already under appeal before the CIT (Appeals). The decision emphasized the significance of jurisdictional limitations and legal precedents in assessing the validity of orders under section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:45:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 145 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64962</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the order passed under section 263 on legal grounds due to the Commissioner exceeding jurisdiction by revising an order already under appeal before the CIT (Appeals). The decision emphasized the significance of jurisdictional limitations and legal precedents in assessing the validity of orders under section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>