<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 126 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64960</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to lack of jurisdiction, inadequate enquiry, and undue haste. The appeal was dismissed, and the AO was directed to redo the assessment after conducting a thorough investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 126 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64960</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s assessment erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to lack of jurisdiction, inadequate enquiry, and undue haste. The appeal was dismissed, and the AO was directed to redo the assessment after conducting a thorough investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>