<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 125 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that a building contractor is not entitled to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as buildings are not considered articles or things within the meaning of the provision. The Tribunal overturned the direction of the CIT (Appeals) allowing the investment allowance to the assessee company for the assessment year 1985-86. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the allowance was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:35:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 125 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that a building contractor is not entitled to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as buildings are not considered articles or things within the meaning of the provision. The Tribunal overturned the direction of the CIT (Appeals) allowing the investment allowance to the assessee company for the assessment year 1985-86. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the allowance was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>