<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 73 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64942</link>
    <description>Chit transactions involving an assessee&#039;s own chits were analysed under the Chit Funds Act, 1961 and the company bye-laws to determine whether the bid amount, dividend and related commission entries fell within mutuality. The arrangement was treated as dealings between the company and its members within a mutual framework, with only commission for services rendered to members being taxable under section 28(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The bid loss claimed on own chits was described as arising from mutual transactions rather than a deductible business loss, and the corresponding receipts connected to those mutual dealings were not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:49:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 73 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64942</link>
      <description>Chit transactions involving an assessee&#039;s own chits were analysed under the Chit Funds Act, 1961 and the company bye-laws to determine whether the bid amount, dividend and related commission entries fell within mutuality. The arrangement was treated as dealings between the company and its members within a mutual framework, with only commission for services rendered to members being taxable under section 28(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The bid loss claimed on own chits was described as arising from mutual transactions rather than a deductible business loss, and the corresponding receipts connected to those mutual dealings were not taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>