<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64941</link>
    <description>The court held that income from winning a lottery run by the Sikkim Government was not taxable under the Income-tax Act due to historical reasons and the applicability of Sikkim regulations. The court emphasized the legal principle against double taxation and concluded that only Sikkim regulations on income tax would apply, not the Income-tax Act rates. As a result, the income from Sikkim lotteries was deemed non-taxable, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:48:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 119 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64941</link>
      <description>The court held that income from winning a lottery run by the Sikkim Government was not taxable under the Income-tax Act due to historical reasons and the applicability of Sikkim regulations. The court emphasized the legal principle against double taxation and concluded that only Sikkim regulations on income tax would apply, not the Income-tax Act rates. As a result, the income from Sikkim lotteries was deemed non-taxable, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>