<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 131 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64923</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the amount of Rs. 90,270, claimed as a debt owed by the appellant but utilized by them without authorization, was taxable under the Wealth-tax Act. The valuation method dispute regarding equity shares of Khosla Foundry Limited was not discussed in the summary. The Tribunal did not provide detailed analysis on the treatment of the compulsory deposit of Rs. 2,44,479 under the C.B.S. Scheme for wealth-tax assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:03:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 131 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64923</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the amount of Rs. 90,270, claimed as a debt owed by the appellant but utilized by them without authorization, was taxable under the Wealth-tax Act. The valuation method dispute regarding equity shares of Khosla Foundry Limited was not discussed in the summary. The Tribunal did not provide detailed analysis on the treatment of the compulsory deposit of Rs. 2,44,479 under the C.B.S. Scheme for wealth-tax assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>