<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 117 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64921</link>
    <description>Valuation of a gifted house property for gift-tax turned on the fair market value method, the treatment of unearned increase payable to the DDA, and whether Rule 1BB of the Wealth-tax Rules should guide valuation. The Tribunal held that unearned increase had to be fully adjusted in determining market value, and that valuation based on the land-and-building method required proper comparable sales support and accurate factual assumptions. It also accepted the principle of consistency between wealth-tax and gift-tax valuation, so the same property should not be valued differently for the two taxes when both depend on fair market value. The GTO&#039;s independent valuation power was recognised, but the declared value was ultimately accepted under Rule 1BB.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:56:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 117 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64921</link>
      <description>Valuation of a gifted house property for gift-tax turned on the fair market value method, the treatment of unearned increase payable to the DDA, and whether Rule 1BB of the Wealth-tax Rules should guide valuation. The Tribunal held that unearned increase had to be fully adjusted in determining market value, and that valuation based on the land-and-building method required proper comparable sales support and accurate factual assumptions. It also accepted the principle of consistency between wealth-tax and gift-tax valuation, so the same property should not be valued differently for the two taxes when both depend on fair market value. The GTO&#039;s independent valuation power was recognised, but the declared value was ultimately accepted under Rule 1BB.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>