<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (3) TMI 127 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64920</link>
    <description>An omitted statutory exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, can constitute a mistake apparent from the record when the relevant facts are already on assessment record but the relief was not claimed in the return. The authority treated the omission as failure to apply a mandatory provision rather than a discretionary matter, and held that section 61 rectification could be used to correct such an error. Where two interpretations are possible, the view favourable to the taxpayer was preferred, and the assessing authority was required to reconsider the exemption claim on the recorded facts and, if needed, call for further material before refusing relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (3) TMI 127 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64920</link>
      <description>An omitted statutory exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, can constitute a mistake apparent from the record when the relevant facts are already on assessment record but the relief was not claimed in the return. The authority treated the omission as failure to apply a mandatory provision rather than a discretionary matter, and held that section 61 rectification could be used to correct such an error. Where two interpretations are possible, the view favourable to the taxpayer was preferred, and the assessing authority was required to reconsider the exemption claim on the recorded facts and, if needed, call for further material before refusing relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>