<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 130 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the retirement of a partner and reconstitution of a partnership firm amounted to dissolution of the old firm, not a mere change in constitution. Section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding succession of one firm by another, was found applicable over Section 187(2) on the change in firm constitution. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to conduct separate assessments for the periods before and after the dissolution of the old firm, overturning the single assessment made initially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:15:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 130 - ITAT DELHI-E</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the retirement of a partner and reconstitution of a partnership firm amounted to dissolution of the old firm, not a mere change in constitution. Section 188 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding succession of one firm by another, was found applicable over Section 187(2) on the change in firm constitution. The Tribunal directed the Income Tax Officer to conduct separate assessments for the periods before and after the dissolution of the old firm, overturning the single assessment made initially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>