<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 359 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in both issues, allowing the depreciation claim on oxygen gas cylinders and the deduction under section 80HHC for export proceeds not received within the stipulated period. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by documentation and banking channels, and deemed the AO&#039;s disallowances unjustified. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, affirming the allowance of both claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 359 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in both issues, allowing the depreciation claim on oxygen gas cylinders and the deduction under section 80HHC for export proceeds not received within the stipulated period. The Tribunal found the transactions genuine, supported by documentation and banking channels, and deemed the AO&#039;s disallowances unjustified. The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, affirming the allowance of both claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>