<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 131 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64878</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as the additions were made on an estimate basis without establishing concealment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of reconciling income and expenditure and providing explanations through documentation like cash flow statements. The decision was influenced by a previous assessment year where penalty proceedings were dropped under similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 131 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64878</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, holding that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not applicable as the additions were made on an estimate basis without establishing concealment. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of reconciling income and expenditure and providing explanations through documentation like cash flow statements. The decision was influenced by a previous assessment year where penalty proceedings were dropped under similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>