<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 83 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 17,45,954 on account of the difference in the value of closing stock. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete evidence from the Revenue to prove actual stock discrepancy, thereby supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoned decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 83 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 17,45,954 on account of the difference in the value of closing stock. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of concrete evidence from the Revenue to prove actual stock discrepancy, thereby supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s reasoned decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>