<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 233 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64858</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the return was not attributable to the assessee but due to the Revenue&#039;s delay in providing seized material. Consequently, the interest under Section 158BFA(1) was deemed not leviable for the period required to obtain the documents. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the interest levied and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 233 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64858</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the return was not attributable to the assessee but due to the Revenue&#039;s delay in providing seized material. Consequently, the interest under Section 158BFA(1) was deemed not leviable for the period required to obtain the documents. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the interest levied and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>