<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 383 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer, determining that the Rs. 4.25 crores received as compensation from DCM constituted a revenue receipt, thereby subject to taxation. The appellant&#039;s claim that the amount was a capital receipt was rejected. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 383 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and the Assessing Officer, determining that the Rs. 4.25 crores received as compensation from DCM constituted a revenue receipt, thereby subject to taxation. The appellant&#039;s claim that the amount was a capital receipt was rejected. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>