<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 332 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64845</link>
    <description>Payments to a non-resident are subject to the payer&#039;s primary obligation to deduct tax under section 195, and the payer cannot finally decide that the recipient&#039;s income is not taxable without obtaining a nil or lower-deduction certificate under section 195(2) or section 197. In the absence of such certificate, failure to deduct tax can trigger disallowance under section 40(a)(i), while any portion on which tax was actually deducted is eligible for relief once verified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 332 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64845</link>
      <description>Payments to a non-resident are subject to the payer&#039;s primary obligation to deduct tax under section 195, and the payer cannot finally decide that the recipient&#039;s income is not taxable without obtaining a nil or lower-deduction certificate under section 195(2) or section 197. In the absence of such certificate, failure to deduct tax can trigger disallowance under section 40(a)(i), while any portion on which tax was actually deducted is eligible for relief once verified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>