<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 182 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64827</link>
    <description>The Department&#039;s appeal was allowed only on the sixth ground concerning undisclosed household expenses, with the deletion of Rs. 84,000 being restored. However, the appeal was dismissed on all other grounds, including the deletion of additions related to cash found and seized, foreign visit expenses, treating capital as income, commission on consignment sales, income from the estate of a deceased mother, and discrepancies in assets appearing in the trial balance sheet.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:49:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 182 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64827</link>
      <description>The Department&#039;s appeal was allowed only on the sixth ground concerning undisclosed household expenses, with the deletion of Rs. 84,000 being restored. However, the appeal was dismissed on all other grounds, including the deletion of additions related to cash found and seized, foreign visit expenses, treating capital as income, commission on consignment sales, income from the estate of a deceased mother, and discrepancies in assets appearing in the trial balance sheet.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>