<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 299 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed both appeals filed by the assessee. The protective and substantive additions made in the hands of the minor and his father were deleted. Additionally, the trading addition and unexplained cash credit were set aside. The Tribunal found the gift received to be genuine and covered by immunity under the relevant Act, leading to the deletion of the addition as unexplained income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 299 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed both appeals filed by the assessee. The protective and substantive additions made in the hands of the minor and his father were deleted. Additionally, the trading addition and unexplained cash credit were set aside. The Tribunal found the gift received to be genuine and covered by immunity under the relevant Act, leading to the deletion of the addition as unexplained income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>