<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 212 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all additions made by the AO in the block period and holding that no surcharge was applicable. The Tribunal emphasized that additions under s. 158BC should be based on material found during the search and not on regular returns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:26:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103261" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 212 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all additions made by the AO in the block period and holding that no surcharge was applicable. The Tribunal emphasized that additions under s. 158BC should be based on material found during the search and not on regular returns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>