<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 318 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64815</link>
    <description>Section 254(2) may be invoked where a Tribunal order rests on a new factual basis that was not argued or put to the parties at hearing, because denial of an opportunity to meet that basis can amount to a mistake apparent from the record and a breach of natural justice. The note explains that, on this reasoning, recall may be justified for a limited rehearing focused on the unaddressed factual foundation so the assessee can respond properly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:10:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 318 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64815</link>
      <description>Section 254(2) may be invoked where a Tribunal order rests on a new factual basis that was not argued or put to the parties at hearing, because denial of an opportunity to meet that basis can amount to a mistake apparent from the record and a breach of natural justice. The note explains that, on this reasoning, recall may be justified for a limited rehearing focused on the unaddressed factual foundation so the assessee can respond properly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>