<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 184 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64811</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of interpreting the Income Tax Act in line with legal principles. It clarified that cash payments made by the employer constituted salary, not a perquisite, and upheld the lower authorities&#039; orders. The decision highlighted the obligation of employers to make accurate income estimates and deduct tax at source based on individual circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:54:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=103252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 184 - ITAT DELHI-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64811</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of interpreting the Income Tax Act in line with legal principles. It clarified that cash payments made by the employer constituted salary, not a perquisite, and upheld the lower authorities&#039; orders. The decision highlighted the obligation of employers to make accurate income estimates and deduct tax at source based on individual circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>